What is PCBA? A Guide to Pick-and-Place Options

Printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) is the process of mounting and soldering electronic components onto a bare printed circuit board (PCB), transforming it into a functional electronic assembly. Whether building a prototype for validation or producing boards at scale, PCB assembly is an essential step that brings design to life.

There are several ways to assemble a board and each comes with trade-offs. Broadly speaking, teams either outsource assembly to a third-party service or bring it in-house, with manual process or automation. This guide walks you through the most common PCBA options, their workflows, pros and cons, and when each approach makes the most sense. 

Outsourcing to an external manufacturer is a common approach for PCB assembly, especially for teams that prioritize professional-grade reliability and economies of scale. 

A widely used option is overseas assembly houses, primarily based in China and Southeast Asia, which specialize in low-cost, high-volume production. These providers typically offer competitive per-unit pricing, though lead times can range from two to four weeks once quoting, communication, assembly, quality control, and international shipping are factored in.

Alternatively, manufacturers in Europe and North America are more expensive but provide faster communication and shorter shipping distances for their local clients.

1. Clients submit necessary files, including: 
   
   • Gerber files for PCB layout
   • The bill of materials (BOM) for component sourcing
   • Component placement lists (CPL) for pick and place operations
2. Design for manufacturability (DFM) checks and quoting by service provider 
3. Parts sourcing, either procured by the supplier based on the BOM or provided by the client.
4. Fabrication and assembly, including 
   
   • PCB fabrication
   • Solder paste application
   • Automated pick-and-place of components
   • Reflow soldering
5. Inspection and testing, including manual inspection by technicians, as well as automated optical inspection (AOI), X-Ray inspection. 
6. Packaging and shipping

• Access to high-reliability assembly lines and professional-grade quality control
• Cost-efficient for large volumes.

• Vetting and establishing trust with a reliable service provider can be time-consuming. 
• Long lead times of several weeks with potential delays, where communications and clarifications add further drag  
• Design revisions during fabrication can be costly if restarting the cycle is required
• Suppliers’ component shortages force engineers to redesign around available parts, causing delays and reducing design agility
• Most services have minimum order quantity (MOQ) requirements that make small runs disproportionally expensive
• Sharing design files can risk intellectual property (IP) exposure and misuse

For early-stage prototyping or very low-volume fabrication, teams often start with manual assembly using tweezers, soldering irons, magnification aids, syringes or stencils, and reflowing via ovens or heat guns. 

The outcome is heavily dependent on the skill and experience of the operator, leading to inconsistent results, particularly with fine-pitch packages. 

Given the high cost of in-house engineering labor, manual assembly is rarely time-efficient, especially when factoring in frequent rework, such as fixing solder bridges, tombstoning, or misaligned parts. 

In practice, even simple prototypes may take hours with manual work, while more complex boards can consume multiple days of effort.

• Full in-house  control over the process
• Instant feedback for iteration

• Very difficult or impossible for miniature components and fine-pitch designs, unscalable, error-prone, and subject to inconsistent, unpredictable quality

Automated pick-and-place (PnP) machines bridge the gap between manual assembly and outsourced production. They use feeders, vacuum nozzles, and vision systems to pick and place surface-mount devices (SMDs) quickly and accurately. 

Automated pick-and-place machines fall into two broad groups: 

Do-it-yourself (DIY) and hobbyist-level pick-and-place machines introduce low-cost, in-house automation, often built on community-contributed hardware and open-source software. Due to this DIY nature, hobbyists benefit from a constantly evolving ecosystem, such as shared designs, 3D-printed feeders, and hardware upgrades. 

However, these DIY machines also present limitations. For example, since they are less structurally rigid than professional systems, the rapid acceleration of the placement head can introduce vibration, thus limiting placement accuracy. In addition, users have noted that achieving consistent performance  requires extensive calibration, including tuning motion systems, nozzle offsets, and feeder height, which adds to the setup time significantly.

Entry-level desktop pick-and-place machines typically support standard feeders and offer basic features like camera-guided alignment. They can be a practical choice for users experimenting with SMT assembly in-house, providing a step up from manual placement. 

However, the reliability of these DIY and entry-level pick and place machines remains inconsistent and users frequently note setup frustrations and limitations in reliability usability (i.e. when handling 0402 components). Difficult-to-use programming interfaces, inconsistent feeder performance, and unreliable peeler performance are also frequently mentioned by users.

Industrial-grade pick-and-place systems are designed for manufacturers to achieve in-line automation. These systems offer high placement speed, large feeder capacity, and high placement accuracy. 

At the top end, full-scale factory equipment are capable of placing tens of thousands of components per hour (CPH) and are integrated with conveyors, solder paste printers, reflow ovens, and inspection systems, enabling end-to-end automation of surface-mount assembly. 

These systems are ideal for continuous, large-scale production environments but are unsuitable for PCB prototyping or small-batch assembly, where their high cost and complex setup requirements outweigh the benefits.

• Enables same-day assembly without the need for outsourcing 
• Improves repeatability, especially for designs requiring tight tolerances
• Unlocks potential for more complex or densely populated layouts with high-accuracy placement 

• Incurs high upfront cost from purchasing equipment, with ongoing maintenance overhead 
• Lower-tier machines may still struggle with reliability, support, or user experience
• Requires training for programming, setup and calibration

There’s no one-size-fits-all method for PCB assembly. Your choice should align with factors such as board volume, design complexity, timeline, budget, resources, and sensitivity around intellectual property.

• Outsourcing: Production volumes or when professional-grade quality is the top priority
• Manual assembly: Very low-volume, one-off prototypes where speed and minimal upfront cost are more important than precision
• Automated pick-and-place: When fast iteration cycles or IP protection are critical

PCB assembly is a balancing act between cost, agility, and quality. By understanding and aligning trade-offs with your team priorities, you can turn designs into working boards more efficiently, while staying on time, on budget, and on track for innovation.

‍